Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 84(3): 324-331, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951843

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: The bone-anchored hearing aid is an effective form of auditory rehabilitation. Due to the nature of the implant, the most common complications are skin related. A number of alternative surgical implantation techniques have been used to reduce the frequency and severity of skin complications, including the U-shaped graft and the linear incision. Objective: To assess skin complications and their association with surgical technique, quality of life, and audiological benefit in patients with bone-anchored hearing aids. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary referral center in Bogotá, Colombia. Patients who had been fitted with a bone-anchored hearing aid implant (unilaterally or bilaterally) for at least 6 months were included in the study. The Holgers classification was used to classify skin complications (Grade 0 = none; Grade 1 = erythema; Grade 2 = erythema and discharge; Grade 3 = granulation tissue; and Grade 4 = inflammation/infection resulting in the removal of the abutment). The Glasgow Benefit Inventory questionnaire was used to determine quality of life, and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit questionnaire was used to determine the subjective audiological benefit. Results: A total of 37 patients were included in the study (30 with unilateral implants and 7 with bilateral implant). Of the 44 implants evaluated, 31 (70.3%) were associated with skin complications (7 [15.9%] Grade 1; 4 [9.1%] Grade 2; 15 [34.1%] Grade 3, 5 [11.4%] Grade 4). The U-shaped graft was statistically associated with major complications (Grades 3 and 4) compared with the linear incision technique (p = 0.045). No statistically significant differences were found between Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit scores and severity of complications. Similarly, no differences were found between Glasgow Benefit Inventory physical health questions and skin complications. Conclusion: Despite the high frequency, skin complications did not seem to affect quality of life or subjective audiological benefits of patients with bone-anchored hearing aids.


Resumo Introdução: A prótese auditiva óssea (BAHA, do inglês Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid) é uma forma eficaz de reabilitação auditiva. Devido à natureza do implante, as complicações mais comuns são relacionadas à pele. Várias técnicas opcionais de implantação cirúrgica têm sido usadas para reduzir a frequência e a gravidade das complicações cutâneas, inclusive o enxerto em forma de U e a incisão linear. Objetivo: Avaliar as complicações cutâneas e sua associação com a técnica cirúrgica, qualidade de vida e benefício audiológico em pacientes com BAHAs. Método: Estudo retrospectivo feito em um centro terciário de referência em Bogotá, Colômbia. Os pacientes que receberam um implante de BAHA (unilateral ou bilateralmente) durante pelo menos seis meses foram incluídos no estudo. A classificação de Holgers foi usada para classificar as complicações cutâneas (Grau 0 = nenhuma, Grau 1 = eritema, Grau 2 = eritema e secreção, Grau 3 = tecido de granulação e Grau 4 = inflamação/infecção, resultou na remoção da estrutura de apoio). O questionário Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) foi usado para determinar a qualidade de vida e o questionário Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) foi usado para determinar o benefício audiológico subjetivo. Resultados: Foram incluídos 37 pacientes (30 com implantes unilaterais e sete com implantes bilaterais). Dos 44 implantes avaliados, 31 (70,3%) foram associados às complicações cutâneas (sete [15,9%] Grau 1; quatro [9,1%] Grau 2; 15 [34,1%] Grau 3 e cinco [11,4%] Grau 4). O enxerto em forma de U foi estatisticamente associado a complicações maiores (Graus 3 e 4) em comparação com a técnica de incisão linear (p = 0,045). Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os escores APHAB e gravidade das complicações. Do mesmo modo, não foram encontradas diferenças entre as questões de saúde física pelo questionário GBI e complicações cutâneas. Conclusão: Apesar da alta frequência, as complicações cutâneas não parecem afetar a qualidade de vida ou os benefícios audiológicos subjetivos de pacientes com BAHAs.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Quality of Life , Skin Diseases/etiology , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Suture Anchors , Hearing Aids/adverse effects , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Time Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Retrospective Studies , Prosthesis Implantation/methods
2.
Acta otorrinolaringol. cir. cabeza cuello ; 42(3): 158-162, jul.-sep. 2014. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-753407

ABSTRACT

El avance en dispositivos de rehabilitación auditiva ha logrado llegar a los dispositivos de transmisión ósea por medio de anclaje al hueso. El BAHA® (Bone Anchored Hearing Aid, Cochlear Co., Australia) es el más usado, dada su ganancia en el rango de frecuencias altas con menor distorsión de la señal; sin embargo, con complicaciones importantes, como infección, pérdida del implante y necesidad de cirugía revisional, que impactan en calidad de vida y costos. Debido a esto se han desarrollado implantes transcutáneos con menos complicaciones y resultados audiológicos similares, como el nuevo sistema activo de conducción ósea Bonebridge®. Objetivo: Describir los resultados auditivos y beneficios comunicativos del sistema implantable transcutáneo activo de conducción ósea Bonebridge® en hipoacusia conductiva y mixta. Diseño: Estudio pseudoexperimental tipo antes y después. Métodos: Se analizó a los pacientes implantados con el Bonebridge® entre octubre del 2012 y agosto del 2013, por el Servicio de Otología del Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, y se evaluaron ganancia funcional en audiometría, logoaudiometría, beneficio comunicativo y APHAB pre y posquirúrgico. Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la vía ósea pre y postoperatoria. En las pruebas en campo libre solo hubo diferencia en la frecuencia de 500 Hz (P < 0,05). Se evidenció ganancia funcional en la discriminación del lenguaje en bisílabos a 60 dB SPL (nivel de presión sonora) (P: 0,042); se encontraron diferencias en el cuestionario de beneficio comunicativo APHAB (P: 0,043) en todas sus subcategorías, exceptuando aversión (P: 0,068). No hubo complicaciones. Conclusiones: El Bonebridge® es seguro y eficaz para la rehabilitación auditiva...


Advances in hearing rehabilitation devices have developed bone conduction devices through bone anchorage, BAHA® (Cochlear Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Co., Australia) is the most used because of its profit in the range of higher frequencies with less signal distortion, however, ought to its complications such as infection, implant loss and need for revisional surgery, which impact in costs and quality of life; transcutaneous implants have been developed with fewer complications and similar audiological results as the new active system Bonebridge® bone conduction. Objective: To describe the auditory results and communicative benefits of the active transcutaneous bone conduction implantable system Bonebridge® for treatment of conductive and mixed hearing loss. Desing: Pseudoexperimental before and after study. Methods: Patients who were implanted with Bonebridge® between October 2012 and August 2013 were analized by the Otology Department from the Fundación Santa Fe University Hospital in Bogotá, assessing functional gain in audiometry, speech audiometry and communicative benefit, APHAB, before and after surgery. Results: No significant differences in bone conduction were found before or after surgery. In free field test there was only a significant difference for 500 Hz frequency (P < 0.05), functional gain was observed in speech discrimination at 60 dB SPL disyllabic (P 0.042). There were differences for communicative benefit questionnaire (P 0.043) with the use of the device in every subcategories except aversion (P 0.068). There were no complications. Conclusion: Bonebridge® is safe and effective for hearing rehabilitations...


Subject(s)
Humans , Auditory Brain Stem Implants , Otolaryngology , Ear, Middle , Hearing Loss
3.
Acta otorrinolaringol. cir. cabeza cuello ; 37(supl.2): 159-164, jun. 2009. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-522612

ABSTRACT

La audición normal es binaural lo cual permite escuchar apropiadamente en ambientes de ruido, localizar el sonido y maximizar el procesamiento auditivo central en las diferentes etapas del desarrollo cortical en lo períodos críticos y en la vida cotidiana. Hoy en día la gran evolución tecnológica en el campo de los implantes cocleares nos ha permitido implantar pacientes desde el primer año de vida y aún antes en casos seleccionados. Igualmente la implantación coclear bilateral tiene importantes ventajas con todo el respaldo científico. En este artículo presentamos la experiencia del Programa de mplante Coclear de la Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá en pacientes adultos y niños que utilizan audiífono y un implante coclear en el oído con menores restos auditivos(estimulación bimodal). Presentamos una revisión de la literatura donde se confirman las ventajas de este tipo de estimulación como discriminar mejor en ambientes de ruido, compensar el efecto sombra de la cabeza, mejorar la localización del sonido y mejorar la capacidad de filtra el lenguaje en ruido (efecto squelch, silenciamiento).


Normal hearing is binaural which allows for the adequate hearing ability in noisy environments, the proper perception of sound direction and maximization of the central auditory process in the various cortical development stages, both during critical periods of time and everyday life. The advanced technological evolution in the field of cochlear implants has allowed us to implant patients from their first year of age and even before in some selected cases, nowadays. Also bilateral cochlear implantation offers significant advantages with all the scientific support. In this article we present the experience of the Cochlear Implant Program at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá in adult patients and in children that use the hearing aid as well as a cochlear implant in the ear with less residual hearing (bimodal stimulation). We present a literature revision that confirms the advantages of this kind of stimulation such as a better sound discrimination ability in noisy environments, the making up for the shadow effect of the head, the enhancement of the ability to track down sounds and also, the improvement of the in noise language filtering skill (the squelch effect, silencing).


Subject(s)
Humans , Cochlear Implants
4.
Bogotá, D.C; s.n; 1996. 46 p. tab, graf.
Thesis in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-190359

ABSTRACT

El programa de "Detección temprana de pérdidas auditivas en el Recién Nacido y Lactantes de Alto Riesgo" es desarrollado en el Hospital Simón Bolivar como parte integral de un trabajo proyectivo e interdisciplinario en el programa de "Atención integral al bebé de bajo peso" en el cual participan activamente los servicios de Audiología y Otorrinolaringología en conjunto con pediatría, nutrición y enfermería. Desde Agosto de 1992 hasta Diciembre de 1995 se evaluaron 280 bebés con peso entre 900 y 2.500 gramos. A cada uno se le realizó su historia clínica completa haciendo énfasis en los antecedentes importantes y barridos auditivos utilizando un reactómetro en la banda estrecha de 3000 Hz y 70 Db de intensidad observándose la respuesta refleja del bebé (cocleopalpebral, Moro, sobresalto y/o movimientos generalizados). Cuando se presentaba una respuesta dudosa se le realizaba impedanciometría y potenciales auditivos evocados para diagnóstico. Además por ser un programa integral se podía hacer un seguimiento del proceso de maduración de la vía auditiva. Se detectaron alteraciones auditivas en un 11 por ciento del número total de bebés y en un 60 por ciento de los bebés con peso inferior a los 1.500 gramos, factor considerado de Alto riego. Se encontraron otros factores de Riesgo como los antecedentes de Hipoglicemia, Hipoxia Neonatal, Drogas Ototóxicas, Hiperbilirrubinemia, Meningitis y Problema Metabólicos. De esta manera se pudo detectar Hipoacusia Neurosensorial en cinco bebés y determinar el ingreso a programas de estimulación temprana y adaptación de audífonos.


Subject(s)
Infant, Newborn , Hearing Disorders , Infant, Newborn
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL